非你莫属
C919开启跨境常态化载客新征程_我的网站

A | 8月12日起,国航CA723/CA724每日往返北京首都国际机场与蒙古国乌兰巴托,去程15时起飞、17时15分抵达,返程18时30分起飞、20时35分落地。这是我国自主干线客机首条对普通旅客开放、纳入全球售票体系的常态化国际商业航线,也意味着C919走完国内规模化运营的练兵阶段,正式开启跨境常态化载客的全新征程。

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi attends a Nagasaki Peace Ceremony to commemorate the 81st anniversary of the atomic bombing at the Peace Park in Nagasaki City on August 9, 2026. Photo: VCGJapanese officials and members of the public urged the government to uphold the Three Non-Nuclear principles and pursue a security policy that does not rely on nuclear weapons, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi maintained an ambiguous stance on the long-held policy during a speech on Sunday marking the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki.
Chinese experts noted that, similar to her ambiguous remarks at the memorial ceremony in Hiroshima, Takaichi stopped short of making a clear commitment to maintaining the Three Non-Nuclear Principles in the future, as her government's stance on nuclear issues has sparked concern and anger among the Japanese public. They also warned that, given Japan's lack of thorough reflection on its wartime aggression, Tokyo's moves to dilute the Three Non-Nuclear Principles should raise alarm across the international community.
"Our country firmly upholds the three non-nuclear principles, and under the pledge that 'Nagasaki shall be the last city to suffer a nuclear attack,' we are promoting realistic and practical initiatives toward the realization of a world without nuclear weapons," Takaichi claimed, according to the Japan Times.
But unlike previous prime ministers, many of whom had pledged that Japan would "continue to uphold" the principles, Takaichi merely described the government's current position without making an explicit commitment about the future, per the report.
As Hiroshima observed the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the city on Thursday, Takaichi also emphasized that Japan pledges to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons while upholding the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, despite Japanese media noting that she has left the door open for future revisions.
Takaichi's remarks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki that Japan upholds the three non-nuclear principles were largely seen as a reaffirmation of the country's existing policy position rather than a pledge to maintain the principles in the future, Liu Jiangyong, a professor at the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University, told the Global Times.
Liu said that currently, some Japanese officials' dangerous remarks on nuclear have sparked criticism among Japanese society. He pointed out that Takaichi only referred to Japan's current adherence to the principles, without explicitly committing to preserving them going forward. Her subsequent focus on broader goals such as achieving a "world without nuclear weapons" has further fueled questions over her actual policy intentions.
Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi claimed in an online program released in July that discussions on nuclear weapons were necessary to strengthen Japan's defense capabilities, according to Kyodo News. While acknowledging that the issue was difficult to discuss in Japan, he claimed it was something that "could not be avoided."
Opposition to the Takaichi administration's nuclear-related moves has emerged across Japan, including from local governments, media organizations and civil society groups.
According to statistics from the Japanese Diet, at least 128 local assemblies across the country had submitted written opinions to the central government or parliament between Takaichi's inauguration on October 21 last year and July 28 this year, calling for the country's Three Non-Nuclear Principles to be upheld, according to Xinhua News Agency.
In an interview with the AFP, 82-year-old Satoshi Tanaka, a campaigner who survived the 1945 attack on Hiroshima expressed frustration that current political leaders like Takaichi are focusing on military capacity at the expense of diplomacy.
"There is so much talk about national security. What about building peace through diplomacy?" he said.
Responding to a question concerning the Japanese authorities are rebuilding Japan's war machine, seeking to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, and pursuing nuclear sharing with the US, even the possession of nuclear weapons, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Thursday that the devastation and tragedies brought by nuclear weapons should never repeat themselves. That said, the particular context of the nuclear explosions should all the more be remembered and the lessons of Japanese militarism's aggression and expansion must forever serve as an alarm.
The Tokyo's moves on nuclear policy have also raised concerns in the international community.
Russia considers the rhetoric of Japanese authorities regarding the need for Japan to revise its Three Non-Nuclear Principles provocative and unacceptable, Russian Ambassador to Japan Nikolai Nozdrev said in an interview with RIA Novosti, which was published on Saturday.
Responding to Koizumi's remarks on nuclear discussion, Nozdrev said "This is the first time in Japan's history, as the only country to have suffered atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that a sitting defense minister has publicly called for lifting the 'taboo' on discussions related to nuclear weapons. We consider such rhetoric from official Tokyo provocative and absolutely unacceptable."
Japan has yet to fully reckon with its wartime aggression, thus any attempt by Tokyo to move toward acquiring nuclear weapons could pose serious risks to regional peace and global security, Lü Chao, an expert on the Korean Peninsula issue at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.
Such concerns have become more pronounced as Japan increasingly portrays China as a major security challenge while highlighting perceived threats from other countries, against such a backdrop, any further steps to dilute the three non-nuclear principles are likely to heighten concerns internationally, particularly among countries that suffered from Japanese aggression during World War II, said Lü.
。 长久以来,业内普遍认为,欧美适航认证是国产客机走向国际市场的唯一门槛。但受访民航专家向科技日报记者表示,此条航线是国产大飞机获得全球认可的起步。往后,随着跨境航线不断增多、海外运营数据持续积累,全球民航界对“中国大飞机”的认知,终将从观望转为信任。

B | 第一问:常态化跨境航班,将要经受哪些实战试炼? 上海交通大学航空航天学院助理研究员田林川介绍,这条航线单程约1200公里,空中飞行2小时15分钟,恰好落在C919最优运营区间。 “能够稳定执飞跨境定期航班,充分印证了C919在安全、可靠、经济等方面,已经达到国际同类客机先进水平。

C | ”田林川说,C919日复一日的跨境运行,将会完整打通空管协同、签派调度、境外地勤、航材补给、出入境对接整套工作流程,积累大量海外真实运行数据,形成一套可复制的国际运营标准,为后续开拓东南亚、中亚航线积攒实践经验。 在他看来,成熟的中蒙双边适航互认,重新理顺了全球民航的准入逻辑。“我们不必被动等待欧美漫长审定流程就能合规运营,这说明欧美适航认证只是国际化的加分项,绝非国产客机出海的唯一硬性门槛。”田林川说。 这条航线落地,意味着我国走完客机研发制造、国内规模化运营、常态化跨境载客的完整产业闭环,打破了波音、空客长期垄断全球干线客机运营的格局。据介绍,C919全新气动布局搭配自主综合航电,在客舱舒适度、机组操作便捷度上优势突出;除标准机型外,近期完成首飞的高原型、规划中的加长型与增程版,以及公务、医疗救护等衍生特种机型,都在丰富这款国产民航飞机的应用场景。 “航展上的亮相是精心筹备的展示,常态化国际航班才是全年无休的实战大考。”西安航空学院航空宇航学院院长董彦非表示,“航展可以调集全部优质资源专项保障,但每日往返的跨境航班,要常态化应对境外快速过站、航材紧急调拨等各类现实问题,而乌兰巴托这条航线,正是国产大飞机国际化的优质实践‘新手村’。” 为什么是乌兰巴托?董彦非解释说,这是遵循“先周边、后全球”的稳妥思路:依托成熟双边适航框架,先在合作深厚的邻国把全套跨境服务、应急处置流程打磨成熟,再稳步向更远区域拓展。 国内数年平稳运营,是C919踏出国门最扎实的底气。据中国商飞透露:截至7月31日,由国航、东航、南航运营的C919飞机累计开通航线57条,通航城市25座,载客超过740万人次。产能稳步爬坡,也支撑国产客机同步向外走。中国商飞已明确提出,到2029年实现年产能200架的目标。 第二问:国产民机该怎样走好长期的全球化布局? “C909在海外蹚出的每条路,都是为C919起飞铺好的跑道。

D | ”董彦非道出国产民机代代接续的发展脉络。 据介绍,C909已在印尼、老挝、越南等地开通25条海外航线,服务旅客超百万人次,摸索出适配境外监管、搭建异地维修体系的全套实操经验。此前,中国国际航空股份有限公司近一年持续用C909执飞呼和浩特至乌兰巴托航线,这让当地机场早已配齐国产客机全套保障能力,为此次C919落地扫清了不少阻碍。 “起飞的是一架架客机,落地的是中国民航走向世界的标准基石。

E | ”在董彦非看来,每一条定期国际航线开通,都会倒逼国内适航体系与国际规则深度对接,带动航材、维修、机组培训、航空租赁整条产业链同步“出海”。“以共建‘一带一路’国家的成功运营为背书,我们会逐步布局区域备件库和合作维修中心,最终以实绩反向促进欧美机构对C919安全记录的客观评估。”董彦非说。 未来,获得欧洲EASA适航证仍是走向国际的关键门槛。

F | 作为和美国FAA并列的全球两大航空安全认证机构,EASA认证拥有广泛国际互认效力,是通往欧美主流市场的“金钥匙”。根据EASA此前披露的消息,C919的全套认证流程预计耗时3至6年,最快或在2028年、最晚可能延至2031年。一旦顺利拿证,C919将有望进驻欧盟及全球90多个国家,真正参与全球干线客机市场的竞争。(记者 王 春 王禹涵)。
Current article:http://o5h1n.xuebenwagangqingre.buzz/vlam/7ipow.html
Published on:22:38:08